span + linear dependence

def (Linear Combination)

A linear combination of v1vmV is a vector of the form

a1v1++vmvm$$where$a1amF$

def (Span)

The set of all possible linear combinations of v1vmV is called the span of vectors v1vm. Denoted span(v1vm)

{a1v1++amvm|a1amF}

By convention span(ϕ)={0}

Proposition: The set span(v1vm) is the smallest subspace of V containing v1vm

Proof: let S=span(v1vm)

  1. S in a subspace:
  • 0S because a1==am=0(F) is in the span

  • S is closed under addition. Suppose u,wS, then a1am and b1bmF.

    u=a1v1++amvmw=b1v1++bmvmu+w=(a1+b1)v1++(am+bm)vmS
  • S is closed under scalar multiplication. Suppose uS. Then,

    u=a1v1++amvmαu=(αa1)v1++(αam)vm

    Thus, S=span(v1vm) is a subspace.

  1. S is the smallest subspace

    Outline: Show v1vmS and if T is any subspace s.t. v1\lodtsvmT then sT.

    • For each vi, vi=0v1++1vi++0vm.
    • Suppose T is a subspace containing v1vm. Since T is a subspace it is closed under addition and scalar multiplication i.e. it is closed under linear combination. Thus T contains all linear combinations of v1vmST.

def (Linearly Independent)

A subspace of V is linearly independent iff

a1v1++anvn=0a1==an=0

By convention, ϕ is linearly independent.

Proposition: A subspace is linearly independent iff none of the vectors is a linear combination of the other.

Proof: In both cases we prove the contrapositive

[=>] W.L.O.G. let v1 be a linear combination of v2vm. Thus,

v1=a2v2+anvn0=(1)v1+a2v2+anvn

Thus, there is a non-trivial way to represent 0.

[<=] Suppose v1vn are linearly dependent. Then there exists a1an not all zero s.t. 0=a1v1+anvn. W.L.O.G. a10

v1=a2a1v2ana1

Thus one of the vectors is a linear combination of the other.

Lemma (Linear Independence Lemma)

Suppose v1vn is a linearly dependent set V. Then j[1,n] s.t. the following hold:

  • vjspan(v1vj1)
  • If vj is removed, the remaining span equals the original span